Search found 498 matches
- Wed Feb 07, 2024 10:57 pm
- Forum: Tools
- Topic: OBDX Development - Developer Tools and Suggestions
- Replies: 907
- Views: 194444
Re: OBDX Development - Developer Tools and Suggestions
The next item I have been excited playing with, is the potential for addition of an SDCard to a new design we are working on. With that, I have been able to do semi and fully automated setups for read/writing engine computers using the tool (Pretty damn cool!!!!!). Logging can also be setup to begi...
- Sat Sep 30, 2023 7:55 am
- Forum: GM LS1 512Kbyte and 1Mbyte and newer
- Topic: PCM Hammer - CAN BUS Communications
- Replies: 30
- Views: 21082
Re: PCM Hammer - CAN BUS Communications
I agree with antus and really like the idea of automating it to try both. By the time you select which one you want to use it’ll already know and be moving on to the next step. That’s assuming you are using it on a known platform with a known OS. As far as I’ve seen PCM Hammer is written centered ar...
- Fri Sep 29, 2023 11:20 pm
- Forum: Custom Code
- Topic: LS1 Boost OS - Development
- Replies: 321
- Views: 134999
Re: LS1 Boost OS - Development
Then we see "PCM and file are both the same hardware P01_P59" BUT it is using that because it has used the default clause, which dates back to the earliest days of PCMHammer, even ls1flash-free before that. That default clause, when an OSID is not recognised, contains: https://github.com/...
- Thu Sep 28, 2023 2:19 am
- Forum: GM LS1 512Kbyte and 1Mbyte and newer
- Topic: PCM Hammer - CAN BUS Communications
- Replies: 30
- Views: 21082
Re: PCM Hammer - CAN BUS Communications
One question I keep thinking about is: Should there be a selection to go between VPW and CAN? Or should it try VPW and then try CAN if it fails? In my branch I added a toggle to the device selection, which works, but I just thought it might make it easier on the user. Obviously that would only make ...
- Mon Sep 25, 2023 1:36 am
- Forum: Tool Development
- Topic: PCMHammer P04
- Replies: 281
- Views: 71826
Re: PCMHammer P04
Didn't see this yesterday, but I put up a PR to fix it. Tested it this time to make sure it worked. https://github.com/LegacyNsfw/PcmHacks/pull/334 [11:21:17:743] PCM Hammer (9/24/2023, 11:21 AM) [11:21:17:750] Sunday, September 24 2023 @11:21:17:74 [11:21:17:756] Initializing J2534 Device [11:21:17...
- Fri Sep 15, 2023 10:52 pm
- Forum: Custom Code
- Topic: LS1 Boost OS - Development
- Replies: 321
- Views: 134999
Re: LS1 Boost OS - Development
I haven't tested to confirm PCM Hammer V21.2 works with custom OS's. I have recommended V20 as it has worked with no issues.
That would be a question for PCM Hammer devs. I'm not sure what that error means.
That would be a question for PCM Hammer devs. I'm not sure what that error means.
- Thu Sep 07, 2023 1:54 am
- Forum: Custom Code
- Topic: LS1 Boost OS - Development
- Replies: 321
- Views: 134999
Re: LS1 Boost OS - Development
No, I don't use TunerPro for logging. I would recommend PCM Logger or OBDXplorer for logging.
- Sun Sep 03, 2023 1:16 am
- Forum: Engineering and Reverse Engineering
- Topic: E92 PCM Reverse Engineering
- Replies: 278
- Views: 72952
Re: E92 PCM Reverse Engineering
What BDM did you use? And do you have a pinout for the connections?In-Tech wrote:In the beginning of working on this, I had to bdm the write.
Is there someplace this is documented?gmtech825 wrote:are you trying to find the cvn/checksum address ranges and algo? that's all known for the e92
- Wed Aug 30, 2023 10:35 pm
- Forum: Engineering and Reverse Engineering
- Topic: E92 PCM Reverse Engineering
- Replies: 278
- Views: 72952
Re: E92 PCM Reverse Engineering
Yes! I wasn't aware that was already known.gmtech825 wrote:are you trying to find the cvn/checksum address ranges and algo? that's all known for the e92
- Wed Aug 30, 2023 11:58 am
- Forum: Engineering and Reverse Engineering
- Topic: E92 PCM Reverse Engineering
- Replies: 278
- Views: 72952
Re: E92 PCM Reverse Engineering
Well I just discovered Mode 9 via SAE J1979 which seems to be a very good resource. Hopefully I can learn some more from that. Edit: Looks like Mode 9 took me to the function that computes the CVN's. This is the first time I've seen CVN's (since I'm more used to P01/P59) and it seems like they are r...