Search found 20 matches
- Wed Jul 26, 2023 2:00 pm
- Forum: GM LS1 512Kbyte and 1Mbyte and newer
- Topic: godiag nano with pcmhammer
- Replies: 72
- Views: 22399
Re: godiag nano with pcmhammer
So. Just found out that godiag has updated firmware and software now. One specific update is for j2534 TX size set to 4128. Looking at it now to see if their update may actually fix it.
- Wed Jan 18, 2023 12:39 am
- Forum: GM LS1 512Kbyte and 1Mbyte and newer
- Topic: godiag nano with pcmhammer
- Replies: 72
- Views: 22399
Re: godiag nano with pcmhammer
@Tazzi Here is log at 6 bytes. Still failing.
- Sun Jan 15, 2023 9:58 am
- Forum: GM LS1 512Kbyte and 1Mbyte and newer
- Topic: godiag nano with pcmhammer
- Replies: 72
- Views: 22399
Re: godiag nano with pcmhammer
So recieved another reply from GoDiag. They of course will not produce firmware for the device as it is intellectual property. Go figure. Nor will they send any build sheets ect. Though, they are claiming that they will have the VPW issue corrected within a month. Shall see if they follow thru and i...
- Sat Jan 14, 2023 2:47 am
- Forum: GM LS1 512Kbyte and 1Mbyte and newer
- Topic: godiag nano with pcmhammer
- Replies: 72
- Views: 22399
Re: godiag nano with pcmhammer
latest logs 24b max PcmHammer_debugLog_20230113@113551_24_1x.txt 128b max PcmHammer_debugLog_20230113@105807_128_1x.txt 192b max PcmHammer_debugLog_20230113@104115_192b_1k.txt 216b max PcmHammer_debugLog_20230113@113914_216_1x.txt again, could be still a power issue so next is to set up a battery su...
- Sat Jan 14, 2023 1:18 am
- Forum: GM LS1 512Kbyte and 1Mbyte and newer
- Topic: godiag nano with pcmhammer
- Replies: 72
- Views: 22399
Re: godiag nano with pcmhammer
So far not having much luck with different buffer size adjustments. If too low pcmhammer will not even pull the OSID and of course fails. Seems so far that I can not go below 192 or else it does not get far at all. 192 it at least goes thru and does state 0% of kernel upload but then times out after...
- Wed Jan 11, 2023 10:46 am
- Forum: GM LS1 512Kbyte and 1Mbyte and newer
- Topic: godiag nano with pcmhammer
- Replies: 72
- Views: 22399
Re: godiag nano with pcmhammer
@Tazzi I am still looking thru and learning the pcmhammer code to find where I can adjust what is needed. Gampy will likely get to it before I can find where the changes should be made in order to test.
- Wed Jan 11, 2023 10:21 am
- Forum: GM LS1 512Kbyte and 1Mbyte and newer
- Topic: godiag nano with pcmhammer
- Replies: 72
- Views: 22399
Re: godiag nano with pcmhammer
I would go ahead and do some changes and test as well as possibly a specific tool config. However I am still finding my way through the code. Getting there with it but not quite to that point yet. If I was, would definitely look into getting a start on it for testing and all.
- Wed Jan 11, 2023 4:19 am
- Forum: GM LS1 512Kbyte and 1Mbyte and newer
- Topic: godiag nano with pcmhammer
- Replies: 72
- Views: 22399
Re: godiag nano with pcmhammer
Here is what it looks like in the selector. As for it stable currently, I guess will have to see if any adjustment can be made to accommodate the max buffer size that they state the device is capable of doing and test it.
- Wed Jan 11, 2023 3:36 am
- Forum: GM LS1 512Kbyte and 1Mbyte and newer
- Topic: godiag nano with pcmhammer
- Replies: 72
- Views: 22399
Re: godiag nano with pcmhammer
@Gampy When you say identify the unit thru J2534, are you referencing when you select the tool in the software? If so, it currently shows as a J2534 device selection in the dropdown using the provided J2534 driver that came directly from godiag. Maybe I did not understand what you are stating there....
- Wed Jan 11, 2023 3:00 am
- Forum: GM LS1 512Kbyte and 1Mbyte and newer
- Topic: godiag nano with pcmhammer
- Replies: 72
- Views: 22399
Re: godiag nano with pcmhammer
I am on same page as you with false advertising being a pet peeve of mine as well. Infuriates me to no end. Just be honest and say what it can do. Not what it might do but not set up for crying out loud! I was thinking the same as it seems that they have 4100 bytes already in use. Maybe they will fi...