need ADX for 8322

160 And 8192 Baud Aldl
Post Reply
Aedakin
Posts: 55
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2020 2:18 am
cars: 77 El Camino Classic
86 K5
94 C1500
Location: Phoenix, Arizona

need ADX for 8322

Post by Aedakin »

Hi. I'm looking for an ADX for 8322 os.

at the same time, what is the cheapest reliable interface. I currently use an OBDLink LX and I think it can be used, but I don't think I'll know til I get an ADX any how.

And what are these ADX files? Are they similar to the XDF files? Can they be easily created? I'm completely in the dark about these things.

Thank you for any help
User avatar
antus
Site Admin
Posts: 8237
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2009 8:34 pm
cars: TX Gemini 2L Twincam
TX Gemini SR20 18psi
Datsun 1200 Ute
Subaru Blitzen '06 EZ30 4th gen, 3.0R Spec B
Contact:

Re: need ADX for 8322

Post by antus »

adx defines how to log. to some extent an adx for any vpw obd2 OS should work on others as the PIDs are standardised between all OS. But I think for logging most people would not use tunerpro, and would use something else, perhaps the logger in the pcmhammer package, or something else.
Have you read the FAQ? For lots of information and links to significant threads see here: http://pcmhacking.net/forums/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=1396
User avatar
Tazzi
Posts: 3422
Joined: Thu May 17, 2012 8:53 pm
cars: VE SS Ute
Location: WA
Contact:

Re: need ADX for 8322

Post by Tazzi »

Aedakin wrote:Hi. I'm looking for an ADX for 8322 os.

at the same time, what is the cheapest reliable interface. I currently use an OBDLink LX and I think it can be used, but I don't think I'll know til I get an ADX any how.

And what are these ADX files? Are they similar to the XDF files? Can they be easily created? I'm completely in the dark about these things.

Thank you for any help
For logging, the best option is to use PCM Logger found on the PCM Hammer git: https://github.com/LegacyNsfw/PcmHacks/releases

As for the interface, the OBDLink will "work", its just incredible slow, and can also have a few hickups depending on firmware revision. Some revisions have more noise and buffer issues then others.

Alternatively, I develop the OBDX Pro scantools which are compatible with PCM Hammer and PCM Logger. You can find this tool here: https://obdxpro.com/product/obdx-pro-vt/
The OBDX Pro is quite alot faster then the OBD Links, plus is able to even work with dealership software now (J2534). :thumbup:
Your Local Aussie Reverse Engineer
Contact for Software/Hardware development and Reverse Engineering
Site:https://www.envyouscustoms.com
Mob:+61406 140 726
Image
Aedakin
Posts: 55
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2020 2:18 am
cars: 77 El Camino Classic
86 K5
94 C1500
Location: Phoenix, Arizona

Re: need ADX for 8322

Post by Aedakin »

ok, i finally found this BCC number i've been hearing about.

YFXZ... this is the number to match for an ADX, right?
Aedakin
Posts: 55
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2020 2:18 am
cars: 77 El Camino Classic
86 K5
94 C1500
Location: Phoenix, Arizona

Re: need ADX for 8322

Post by Aedakin »

and i was thinking at first about using TP RT to dial in my VE chart. had seen it done on you tube with the OBDLink LX like i have.
Aedakin
Posts: 55
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2020 2:18 am
cars: 77 El Camino Classic
86 K5
94 C1500
Location: Phoenix, Arizona

Re: need ADX for 8322

Post by Aedakin »

and thank you Tazzi, I will checkout PCM Logger.
User avatar
Gampy
Posts: 2330
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2018 7:38 am

Re: need ADX for 8322

Post by Gampy »

Pcm Logger is raw in development and has some slight usability issues ... Please see here: pcmhacking.net/forums/viewtopic.php

Obviously any problems, ask!
Intelligence is in the details!

It is easier not to learn bad habits, then it is to break them!

If I was here to win a popularity contest, their would be no point, so I wouldn't be here!
Post Reply