Generator Idle

For discussion and distribution of custom code and hacks
Charles S
Posts: 43
Joined: Sun May 10, 2015 11:00 am
cars: 68 Chev Impala.. 327
69 Dodge Phoenix.. 383
64 Chevelle Ute.. 283
V6 VY 3.8L 20KW Generator Project

Re: Generator Idle

Post by Charles S »

just a stupid thought ... how about if the iac output was driving a stepper motor on the butterfly...?
faster response and allow wot...
User avatar
Holden202T
Posts: 10311
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2009 9:05 pm
Location: Tenambit, NSW
Contact:

Re: Generator Idle

Post by Holden202T »

that's not a bad idea worth a try I guess.
Charles S
Posts: 43
Joined: Sun May 10, 2015 11:00 am
cars: 68 Chev Impala.. 327
69 Dodge Phoenix.. 383
64 Chevelle Ute.. 283
V6 VY 3.8L 20KW Generator Project

Re: Generator Idle

Post by Charles S »

im having a problem with vats error and $51 enhanced bin... im not running a bcm but pcm has vats error if vats is disabled or not wit TPrt...

is there something im doing wrong..?
User avatar
antus
Site Admin
Posts: 8237
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2009 8:34 pm
cars: TX Gemini 2L Twincam
TX Gemini SR20 18psi
Datsun 1200 Ute
Subaru Blitzen '06 EZ30 4th gen, 3.0R Spec B
Contact:

Re: Generator Idle

Post by antus »

Maybe, post up your bin? Did you do a bin write once to get the enhanced code on there? Vats disables injectors so if its running it must not be active. Did you choose fix checksum after writing? That should sort the code 51.
Have you read the FAQ? For lots of information and links to significant threads see here: http://pcmhacking.net/forums/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=1396
Charles S
Posts: 43
Joined: Sun May 10, 2015 11:00 am
cars: 68 Chev Impala.. 327
69 Dodge Phoenix.. 383
64 Chevelle Ute.. 283
V6 VY 3.8L 20KW Generator Project

Re: Generator Idle

Post by Charles S »

where is fix checksum in tunerpro rt..?
User avatar
antus
Site Admin
Posts: 8237
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2009 8:34 pm
cars: TX Gemini 2L Twincam
TX Gemini SR20 18psi
Datsun 1200 Ute
Subaru Blitzen '06 EZ30 4th gen, 3.0R Spec B
Contact:

Re: Generator Idle

Post by antus »

When you flash a VY computer with the OSE flashtool it will ask you if you want to fix the checksum, and you pick yes.
Have you read the FAQ? For lots of information and links to significant threads see here: http://pcmhacking.net/forums/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=1396
Charles S
Posts: 43
Joined: Sun May 10, 2015 11:00 am
cars: 68 Chev Impala.. 327
69 Dodge Phoenix.. 383
64 Chevelle Ute.. 283
V6 VY 3.8L 20KW Generator Project

Re: Generator Idle

Post by Charles S »

im using a 16199728 pcm(pink and blue conns)... im erasing and programming 27c010's .... tprt seems to correct the sum on it's own every time i reload the bin...

have i missed something...? i have CKUL modified and running @1500rev's ... , i am trying to change to $51 enhanced for the rt tuning and dash etc...
i have comms working... da connected and data happening but no injectors.... pretty sure its DTC 31 and 41 problems...

tis all new to me...1st time i have used TPRT... i probibally missed something...
Charles S
Posts: 43
Joined: Sun May 10, 2015 11:00 am
cars: 68 Chev Impala.. 327
69 Dodge Phoenix.. 383
64 Chevelle Ute.. 283
V6 VY 3.8L 20KW Generator Project

Re: Generator Idle

Post by Charles S »

GOT IT..! thank's antus..
User avatar
antus
Site Admin
Posts: 8237
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2009 8:34 pm
cars: TX Gemini 2L Twincam
TX Gemini SR20 18psi
Datsun 1200 Ute
Subaru Blitzen '06 EZ30 4th gen, 3.0R Spec B
Contact:

Re: Generator Idle

Post by antus »

Sorry yeah I was referring to the VX/VY non-SC flash pcm (service number 09356445) with the tan and brown connectors, not the memcal one you are using.
Have you read the FAQ? For lots of information and links to significant threads see here: http://pcmhacking.net/forums/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=1396
Charles S
Posts: 43
Joined: Sun May 10, 2015 11:00 am
cars: 68 Chev Impala.. 327
69 Dodge Phoenix.. 383
64 Chevelle Ute.. 283
V6 VY 3.8L 20KW Generator Project

Re: Generator Idle

Post by Charles S »

any ideas regarding WIN10 / WIN7 tunerproRT 9017 error "api-ms-win-crt-stdio-i1-1-0.dll" missing ....
Post Reply