LS1 Boost OS - Development

For discussion and distribution of custom code and hacks
User avatar
NSFW
Posts: 679
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2018 3:13 pm

Re: LS1 Boost OS - Development

Post by NSFW »

bubba2533 wrote: I am pushing towards variables seen in most aftermarket ECU's. So I've actually considered creating a new set of spark tables that are based on MAP and not g/cyl. This would also allow for the removal of my Boost Spark Adder table since I could just increase the size/range of the table.
Cool. I started with tuning stock ECUs so I'm just used to having a g/cyl axis... but as long as fuel and spark use the same axes, then it doesn't really matter which.

I might switch to this OS for my car, even though it's naturally aspirated, just so I won't have to deal with power enrichment. I'd much rather have a proper fuel table instead. :)
Please don't PM me with technical questions - start a thread instead, and send me a link to it. That way I can answer in public, and help other people who have the same question. Thanks!
Highlander
Posts: 81
Joined: Sun May 11, 2014 6:36 pm
cars: Z06

Re: LS1 Boost OS - Development

Post by Highlander »

bubba2533 wrote:So....I changed things again...

I've changed how I am doing desired air/fuel ratio. I replaced power enrichment with 2 new "Desired Air/Fuel Ratio" 3D tables based on MAP and RPM. I added 2 of them to allow for different Air/Fuel ratios between E0 and E80 (Flex Fuel Enabled).

I've stopped working on V3 and I'm going to start doing testing in my truck. I would like to get this out there for other people to play with as I think it's a huge upgrade from V2. There are significant changes so there will be no easy way to upgrade from V2 -> V3. But I'm hopeful that all the changes I've made will allow for relatively easy upgrades in the future.

Also......I've started work on V4 that will allow for some big changes for the MAF guys....lots more work to do, but it's looking pretty easy to increase the MAF frequency and g/sec capacity. If you are interested or have an opinion on the table size/limit for an update MAF calibration let me know what you think it should look like.

Edit:
P59 MAF curve is 1500-12,000 Hz with 125 Hz resolution and a maximum airflow value of 511.99 grams/second
E37 & E92 MAF curve is 0-15,000 Hz with 150 Hz resolution and a maximum airflow value of 4,000 grams/second
You can increase the MAF Hz super easy on these. the g/s is going to be more dependent on the scaling that you use throughout. By changing inj constant you actually scale the maf directly in these.
E92 has ability to edit the labels. While its not needed (always liked the 150hz scaling) it is sometimes beneficial on cam'd cars.
Highlander
Posts: 81
Joined: Sun May 11, 2014 6:36 pm
cars: Z06

Re: LS1 Boost OS - Development

Post by Highlander »

Phoenix wrote:Please forgive me if this has been discussed before, but would it be possible to extend the Injector Flow Rate table to boost areas? I know that up to know people have been compensating by either adding more fuel or using a boost referenced regulator, but I think it would be pretty neat to give the PCM accurate injector data while in boost. I don;t think one would need to increase the table size, just change the values that are referenced. Please take a look at the attached injector data, I took this from the ID725 spreadsheet. The top table is what the P59 currently has and the bottom table is what I'm talking about changing it into. I'm not sure what OS or ECM uses the lower table.

0 kPa is atmospheric pressure, positive kPa is vacuum and negative kPa is boost. The lower table would max out around 12 psi in boost. Maybe the two halves can be scaled differently so the boost side could include more columns than the vacuum side?
I was always interested in doing thsi mod, but in reality, it is sort of useless as most of the time people have vac referenced pressure regulators as it natively increases the injector range of airflow it can fuel.

better mod would be to add fuel pressure sensor and adjust by it
aaronc7
Posts: 53
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2020 12:35 pm
cars: 2003 C5Z
2017 Audi S3

Re: LS1 Boost OS - Development

Post by aaronc7 »

I know you've been putting your time into E92 stuff lately, just wondering if this 'new' stuff ever got to a point of being something releasable?

Anyways, I'd still love to try out the closed loop PE stuff sometime.
bubba2533
Posts: 498
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 8:50 am
cars: 03 Chevy S10 Turbo V6

Re: LS1 Boost OS - Development

Post by bubba2533 »

Yeah, I just haven't spent much time testing it as I would like to. It's been a little more difficult to get out and test it.

I was also hoping to have a better patching tool to make it more user friendly, but I am probably the wrong person to do that.
LS1 Boost OS V3 Here. For feature suggestions post in here Development Thread. Support future development ->Patreon.
Stokes1114
Posts: 49
Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2017 11:09 pm
cars: 93 K1500, 5.7, 4L60E, 16168625 $E6

Re: LS1 Boost OS - Development

Post by Stokes1114 »

I definitely don't mind testing anything in car to help. I converted to a p59 in anticipation, and have a few extra pcm's just in case.
bubba2533
Posts: 498
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 8:50 am
cars: 03 Chevy S10 Turbo V6

Re: LS1 Boost OS - Development

Post by bubba2533 »

Ok, no idea how I didn't think of it. But someone made me think of just posting a bin with the modified OS already patched to a standard bin file.

I haven't modified or added any of the standard calibration/parameter section of the bin file, so I'm pretty sure it should work.

I'm going to do one more pass through the XDF to make sure I didn't miss anything and then I'll release it.
LS1 Boost OS V3 Here. For feature suggestions post in here Development Thread. Support future development ->Patreon.
Stokes1114
Posts: 49
Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2017 11:09 pm
cars: 93 K1500, 5.7, 4L60E, 16168625 $E6

Re: LS1 Boost OS - Development

Post by Stokes1114 »

Sweet man! Looking forward to it!
kojab
Posts: 440
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2009 11:52 am
cars: VT V6 supercharged in a corolla
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Re: LS1 Boost OS - Development

Post by kojab »

Have a problem with the 3 BAR "Open Loop EQ'' table. It is not seeing any boost. Tried "slowtahoe's" Custom 2 BAR bin on my test bench and it seems to have the same problem.
bubba2533
Posts: 498
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 8:50 am
cars: 03 Chevy S10 Turbo V6

Re: LS1 Boost OS - Development

Post by bubba2533 »

kojab wrote:Have a problem with the 3 BAR "Open Loop EQ'' table. It is not seeing any boost. Tried "slowtahoe's" Custom 2 BAR bin on my test bench and it seems to have the same problem.
I'm not sure what you mean by not seeing any boost. Can you explain what you are doing?
LS1 Boost OS V3 Here. For feature suggestions post in here Development Thread. Support future development ->Patreon.
Post Reply