godiag nano with pcmhammer

They go by many names, P01, P59, VPW, '0411 etc. Also covering E38 and newer here.
In-Tech
Posts: 787
Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2020 4:35 pm
Location: California

Re: godiag nano with pcmhammer

Post by In-Tech »

Grab it before it gets deleted in case it's illegal to post.
SAE J1850.pdf
(1.03 MiB) Downloaded 109 times
User avatar
Tazzi
Posts: 3425
Joined: Thu May 17, 2012 8:53 pm
cars: VE SS Ute
Location: WA
Contact:

Re: godiag nano with pcmhammer

Post by Tazzi »

Gampy wrote: And may I ask what that is ??

-Enjoy
Just double checked the data sheet, and its 12 including header and checksum (checksum is almost always hidden on most tools).
Your Local Aussie Reverse Engineer
Contact for Software/Hardware development and Reverse Engineering
Site:https://www.envyouscustoms.com
Mob:+61406 140 726
Image
User avatar
Gampy
Posts: 2332
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2018 7:38 am

Re: godiag nano with pcmhammer

Post by Gampy »

Thank you! :thumbup:

-Enjoy
Intelligence is in the details!

It is easier not to learn bad habits, then it is to break them!

If I was here to win a popularity contest, their would be no point, so I wouldn't be here!
User avatar
Gampy
Posts: 2332
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2018 7:38 am

Re: godiag nano with pcmhammer

Post by Gampy »

Thought I would post these logs ...

Packet size is 1 + 12, PCMHammer will not do 12 bytes.
UniversalPatcherLogger.txt
(10.07 KiB) Downloaded 60 times
PCMHammer.txt
(11.33 KiB) Downloaded 57 times
-Enjoy
Intelligence is in the details!

It is easier not to learn bad habits, then it is to break them!

If I was here to win a popularity contest, their would be no point, so I wouldn't be here!
kur4o
Posts: 950
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2016 9:20 pm

Re: godiag nano with pcmhammer

Post by kur4o »

The absolute minimum for sending upload is

3 bytes header + 2 bytes mode/submode +2 bytes size + 3 bytes address + 2 bytes data + 2 bytes block checksum
14 bytes total +1 byte crc checksum

the 77 error means block checksum is incorrect.

increase data to 2 bytes, that cpu really don`t like odd address and single odd bytes count.
User avatar
Gampy
Posts: 2332
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2018 7:38 am

Re: godiag nano with pcmhammer

Post by Gampy »

I will try ... However it works one byte at a time using 1 + 12 with other VCI's, it took 10+ minutes to verify a P59!

-Enjoy
Intelligence is in the details!

It is easier not to learn bad habits, then it is to break them!

If I was here to win a popularity contest, their would be no point, so I wouldn't be here!
kur4o
Posts: 950
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2016 9:20 pm

Re: godiag nano with pcmhammer

Post by kur4o »

With 1 byte of data you still need 13+1 bytes buffer for sending
User avatar
Tazzi
Posts: 3425
Joined: Thu May 17, 2012 8:53 pm
cars: VE SS Ute
Location: WA
Contact:

Re: godiag nano with pcmhammer

Post by Tazzi »

Gampy wrote:I will try ... However it works one byte at a time using 1 + 12 with other VCI's, it took 10+ minutes to verify a P59!

-Enjoy
How long did that take to read!! :shock:
Your Local Aussie Reverse Engineer
Contact for Software/Hardware development and Reverse Engineering
Site:https://www.envyouscustoms.com
Mob:+61406 140 726
Image
User avatar
Gampy
Posts: 2332
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2018 7:38 am

Re: godiag nano with pcmhammer

Post by Gampy »

I have no clue, I suspect PCMHammer's debug log will choke it!

-Enjoy
Intelligence is in the details!

It is easier not to learn bad habits, then it is to break them!

If I was here to win a popularity contest, their would be no point, so I wouldn't be here!
99zguy
Posts: 20
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2023 3:30 am
cars: 99 Z28
97 Trans Am Vert
10 LS Camaro
08 Silverado
02 Avalanche
52 GMC 5.3 swap (in progress)
56 Chevy Hardtop (in progress)
Location: PA

Re: godiag nano with pcmhammer

Post by 99zguy »

So. Just found out that godiag has updated firmware and software now. One specific update is for j2534 TX size set to 4128. Looking at it now to see if their update may actually fix it.
Post Reply