1227808 Vs 16206305

Holden/Delco Tuning. ALDL, OBD 1.5. Circa 1989 to 2004.
User avatar
delcowizzid
Posts: 5493
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2009 8:38 pm
Location: Wellington NZ
Contact:

1227808 Vs 16206305

Post by delcowizzid »

Heres a few pics of the 1227808 vn ecu compared to the 16206305 vr v8 ecu.which can be swapped to use the highspeed aldl with the correct 8192 buad bin file very little difference apart from the missing uart chip from the 808 is in the 16206305 to allow the 8192baud aldl.and the fact it has better componants and tracks.

808 on the left 16206305 on the right
PB120108c.jpg
PB120108c.jpg (183.88 KiB) Viewed 7270 times
heres a close-up of the 808
PB120113c.jpg
PB120113c.jpg (193.56 KiB) Viewed 7270 times

and heres a close-up of the 16206305
PB120114c.jpg
PB120114c.jpg (191.28 KiB) Viewed 7269 times
If Its Got Gas Or Ass Count Me In.if it cant be fixed with a hammer you have an electrical problem
delcosmurf
Posts: 13
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2009 3:43 pm

Re: 1227808 Vs 16206305

Post by delcosmurf »

yes definatly a much higher quality PCB in the VR manual ecu as you can see in the picks the tracks look like they are lifting and have bubbled in the 808 ecu where the 305 is much nicer.and the highspeed comms is a nice bonus when logging i couldnt go back to 160 baud logging after 8192 its just so slow after using 8192 baud ecu.
FXST01
Posts: 17
Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2009 7:20 pm
cars: VP V6 Commodore

Re: 1227808 Vs 16206305

Post by FXST01 »

So is it a straight swap (plug n play wise) to put a VR ECU into a VP?
User avatar
delcowizzid
Posts: 5493
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2009 8:38 pm
Location: Wellington NZ
Contact:

Re: 1227808 Vs 16206305

Post by delcowizzid »

VR manual ecu yes. vr auto ecu no cause smoke will come out :mrgreen:
If Its Got Gas Or Ass Count Me In.if it cant be fixed with a hammer you have an electrical problem
User avatar
Jayme
Posts: 2585
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 8:59 am
Location: North Coast, NSW

Re: 1227808 Vs 16206305

Post by Jayme »

also in the tune turn off anti theft and change ppk to 1250 and you are running.
FXST01
Posts: 17
Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2009 7:20 pm
cars: VP V6 Commodore

Re: 1227808 Vs 16206305

Post by FXST01 »

delcowizzid wrote:VR manual ecu yes. vr auto ecu no cause smoke will come out :mrgreen:
Aren't both VR manual and auto ECUs the same, just the memcal iself that is different?
yoda69
Posts: 1215
Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2009 10:20 am
cars: 2004 VYII Acclaim Wagon V6 Auto LPG/Petrol
2004 VYII Berlina sedan V6 Auto
2005 VZ Monaro CV8 manual
Location: Geelong, VIC

Re: 1227808 Vs 16206305

Post by yoda69 »

Looks like Delcowizzid got somebody to take same photos for him :) you can actually tell what they are for a change.
Only kidding, good to get a look inside a few of these.

As far as the Auto is concerned it uses a different ECM in the VR as it is an electronic auto. The only electronics for the VN/P Auto was for the torque converter lock up I believe.
User avatar
delcowizzid
Posts: 5493
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2009 8:38 pm
Location: Wellington NZ
Contact:

Re: 1227808 Vs 16206305

Post by delcowizzid »

FXST01 wrote:
delcowizzid wrote:VR manual ecu yes. vr auto ecu no cause smoke will come out :mrgreen:
Aren't both VR manual and auto ECUs the same, just the memcal iself that is different?

nope totally different ecu and wiring for the ecu plugs power etc goes in different pins
If Its Got Gas Or Ass Count Me In.if it cant be fixed with a hammer you have an electrical problem
FXST01
Posts: 17
Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2009 7:20 pm
cars: VP V6 Commodore

Re: 1227808 Vs 16206305

Post by FXST01 »

There goes that plan. Thanks for all your help.
FXST01
Posts: 17
Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2009 7:20 pm
cars: VP V6 Commodore

Re: 1227808 Vs 16206305

Post by FXST01 »

Is the VR manual 16206305 the same as the VS manual 16206305, do they take the same physical memcal as the VN/VPs take?
Post Reply