No, I don't think so. The cells are smaller but they hold less charge. Only programming takes longer, because unlike erasure, it's done one byte at a time.vlad01 wrote:The higher the capacity the eprom the longer it takes to clear under UV as the cells have a physically smaller surface area for exposure.
Joe.
PS. Double-checked the datasheets ...
The Intel 2716 datasheet says "The integrated dose (i.e. UV intensity x exposure time) for erasure should be a minimum of 15 Ws/cm2", while the SGS-Thomson 27512 datasheet says "The integrated dose (i.e. UV intensity x exposure time) for erasure should be a minimum of 15 W-sec/cm2". So 2kB to 64kB with identical erasure dosage.