Hey
I use 3 different xdf files
Plus I use 2 plugins (Located in documents/tunerpro files/plugins)
The first xdf works perfect (It's locked for modifying.)
I have problems using the 2nd xdf file.
After modifying saving and trying to write PCMHammer says that there is bad OS segment (The very first line after choosing modded bin)
The picture is an example. It's not my screenshot.
12587603+AC.xdf allows to change OS checksum value manually, but I think this is not the right way.
How to solve the problem?
12587603 XDF Checksum problems
12587603 XDF Checksum problems
Last edited by yoheer on Thu Jan 07, 2021 9:17 am, edited 1 time in total.
- antus
- Site Admin
- Posts: 8251
- Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2009 8:34 pm
- cars: TX Gemini 2L Twincam
TX Gemini SR20 18psi
Datsun 1200 Ute
Subaru Blitzen '06 EZ30 4th gen, 3.0R Spec B - Contact:
Re: 12587603 XDF Checksum problems
2 ways
1) If you are not editing adding a code patch, remove the os checksum calculator completely, as that segment wont change for normal tuning.
2) Set up the XDF like this, and select the working plugin.
1) If you are not editing adding a code patch, remove the os checksum calculator completely, as that segment wont change for normal tuning.
2) Set up the XDF like this, and select the working plugin.
- Attachments
-
- p59 os checksum config.png (79.01 KiB) Viewed 3319 times
Have you read the FAQ? For lots of information and links to significant threads see here: http://pcmhacking.net/forums/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=1396
Re: 12587603 XDF Checksum problems
Antus, thank you VERY MUCH!
I just tried second way. It works!!!
Today I wasted 7 hours sitting in a car and trying to make a correct file and flash the pcm. And it was just kicking my butt
I just tried second way. It works!!!
Today I wasted 7 hours sitting in a car and trying to make a correct file and flash the pcm. And it was just kicking my butt
Re: 12587603 XDF Checksum problems
Btw is it ok that i make some parameter mods, but checksum changes in OS segment?
- antus
- Site Admin
- Posts: 8251
- Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2009 8:34 pm
- cars: TX Gemini 2L Twincam
TX Gemini SR20 18psi
Datsun 1200 Ute
Subaru Blitzen '06 EZ30 4th gen, 3.0R Spec B - Contact:
Re: 12587603 XDF Checksum problems
It does sound suspicious, I'd check exactly what changed against another XDF or app. Or tell us what your changing and post up the address which changes in the bin and I can validate it. Calibration changes are not using in the OS segment. Can you post up a before and after bin?
Have you read the FAQ? For lots of information and links to significant threads see here: http://pcmhacking.net/forums/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=1396
Re: 12587603 XDF Checksum problems
Having issues with tunnerpro. I get a checksum error when saving bin files. I tried re-save of a virgin file I read from my daily driver, no changes received same message. Pcm hammer program now says file is corrupt and will damage pcm. I'm new to this sorry for my ignorance
-
- Posts: 42
- Joined: Sun Jan 26, 2020 11:41 pm
- cars: 1970 Chevy El Camino with an LM7 modern GM engine.
2013 Chevrolet SS Camaro
Re: 12587603 XDF Checksum problems
Do you have all of the correct plug ins installed for Tuner Pro RT? Did you edit your BIN OS file using the correct XDF file? This second question seems to be what bites most people.
Rick
Rick
- antus
- Site Admin
- Posts: 8251
- Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2009 8:34 pm
- cars: TX Gemini 2L Twincam
TX Gemini SR20 18psi
Datsun 1200 Ute
Subaru Blitzen '06 EZ30 4th gen, 3.0R Spec B - Contact:
Re: 12587603 XDF Checksum problems
Ideally, unless your installing OS patches (most people are not), if the XDF isnt locked (many are) you can delete the OS checksum an then make your edits again in a new copy of the file. The OS checksum and plugins concept kind of got legs of its own and created more problems than it solved. Calibration changes DO NOT require the OS checksum to be updated and re-written, most XDFs do not have any data fields that necessitates that sum.
Have you read the FAQ? For lots of information and links to significant threads see here: http://pcmhacking.net/forums/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=1396