OS 12592618 P59 XDF File
Re: OS 12592618 P59 XDF File
Just verified with HPT. All good. Thanks for the update!
-
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2021 12:36 am
- cars: volvo
Re: OS 12592618 P59 XDF File
figured i would mention that, at this time, universal patcher and this XDF disagree on VATS and VTD configuration. Not sure on which side the issue is but it sounds like this XDF has been vetted with commercial tools.
details: set vtd config to 1 (none) in universal patcher
open in bin in tunerpro with this xdf
vats will say 1 (PWM)
vtd config unchanged
Thanks
details: set vtd config to 1 (none) in universal patcher
open in bin in tunerpro with this xdf
vats will say 1 (PWM)
vtd config unchanged
Thanks
-
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2021 4:17 am
- cars: GM/GMC
Re: OS 12592618 P59 XDF File
What did it say in Efi live?
Re: OS 12592618 P59 XDF File
EFI Live says 0 = Class2, 1 = None.
-Enjoy
-Enjoy
Intelligence is in the details!
It is easier not to learn bad habits, then it is to break them!
If I was here to win a popularity contest, their would be no point, so I wouldn't be here!
It is easier not to learn bad habits, then it is to break them!
If I was here to win a popularity contest, their would be no point, so I wouldn't be here!
-
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2021 4:17 am
- cars: GM/GMC
Re: OS 12592618 P59 XDF File
I think this needs to be done to the 2006 xdfs
Re: OS 12592618 P59 XDF File
I took two bins, before and after a crank relearn. I see a difference from 0x603f to 0x6e8f. How to do you figure out what this data is and how to display it with the XDF?
- antus
- Site Admin
- Posts: 8541
- Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2009 8:34 pm
- cars: TX Gemini 2L Twincam
TX Gemini SR20 18psi
Datsun 1200 Ute
Subaru Blitzen '06 EZ30 4th gen, 3.0R Spec B - Contact:
Re: OS 12592618 P59 XDF File
0x6000 is the param block, its not a segment that is usually edited on the PC. Rather the PCM persists data, like crank relearn, there. Universal patcher is probably the tool that can make the most sense of it. But you would not normally manually edit it, you'd repeat the CASE relearn procedure and let the PCM update it.
Have you read the FAQ? For lots of information and links to significant threads see here: http://pcmhacking.net/forums/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=1396