, but i guess the output results still speak the same as in the problem was the MAF, would the output freqency be still ruffly the same then? As you still get to the point when it goes no higher. Nice to see the Genuine MAF still has more headroom over over the stock LS2 tables.4" intake piping - 95MM MAF Tuning
Re: 4" intake piping - 95MM MAF Tuning
arh ok, yeh i guessd there would have to be something in the pcm to get a smoother output, it was a bit hard with the sample time, while holding a MAF and aircompressor gun and hitting the stop button , but i guess the output results still speak the same as in the problem was the MAF, would the output freqency be still ruffly the same then? As you still get to the point when it goes no higher. Nice to see the Genuine MAF still has more headroom over over the stock LS2 tables.
, but i guess the output results still speak the same as in the problem was the MAF, would the output freqency be still ruffly the same then? As you still get to the point when it goes no higher. Nice to see the Genuine MAF still has more headroom over over the stock LS2 tables.Re: 4" intake piping - 95MM MAF Tuning
well did a quick run, for the genuine LS2 MAF use a base inj rate of 290 will get you within 10%, then tweak the rest with MAF tables, Log attached.
- Attachments
-
- test genuine ls2 - maf stock tables - 290ms gram inj.xdl
- (596.64 KiB) Downloaded 266 times