V6 ability for pcm hammer.

They go by many names, P01, P59, VPW, '0411 etc. Also covering E38 and newer here.
Vampyre
Posts: 261
Joined: Wed Dec 06, 2017 1:02 pm
cars: grand am, trans am

Re: V6 ability for pcm hammer.

Post by Vampyre »

Talk to a few guys and apparently some p04s use a differnt algo, think its the pre 2000 ones I'll look more into it
Glad to see your up and about gampy
User avatar
antus
Site Admin
Posts: 8238
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2009 8:34 pm
cars: TX Gemini 2L Twincam
TX Gemini SR20 18psi
Datsun 1200 Ute
Subaru Blitzen '06 EZ30 4th gen, 3.0R Spec B
Contact:

Re: V6 ability for pcm hammer.

Post by antus »

It defaults to p01/p59 so that osid isnt in the hwid columns i used from the file you posted a few pages back. I didnt commit all of them, but i thought a got all the sections for the hwid were all looking at, at the moment.
Have you read the FAQ? For lots of information and links to significant threads see here: http://pcmhacking.net/forums/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=1396
User avatar
antus
Site Admin
Posts: 8238
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2009 8:34 pm
cars: TX Gemini 2L Twincam
TX Gemini SR20 18psi
Datsun 1200 Ute
Subaru Blitzen '06 EZ30 4th gen, 3.0R Spec B
Contact:

Re: V6 ability for pcm hammer.

Post by antus »

Ive been playing with the modified micro-kernel and my own asm kernel from ls1flash-free, so far just getting crashes after upload.
Have you read the FAQ? For lots of information and links to significant threads see here: http://pcmhacking.net/forums/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=1396
User avatar
Gampy
Posts: 2331
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2018 7:38 am

Re: V6 ability for pcm hammer.

Post by Gampy »

antus wrote:It defaults to p01/p59 so that osid isnt in the hwid columns i used from the file you posted a few pages back. I didnt commit all of them, but i thought a got all the sections for the hwid were all looking at, at the moment.
Lost me here ... :?:
antus wrote:Ive been playing with the modified micro-kernel and my own asm kernel from ls1flash-free, so far just getting crashes after upload.
Are you saying the Micro Kernel I posted isn't working??

It is not the same as the Micro-kernel included in the PcmHammer suite ...
Intelligence is in the details!

It is easier not to learn bad habits, then it is to break them!

If I was here to win a popularity contest, their would be no point, so I wouldn't be here!
User avatar
antus
Site Admin
Posts: 8238
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2009 8:34 pm
cars: TX Gemini 2L Twincam
TX Gemini SR20 18psi
Datsun 1200 Ute
Subaru Blitzen '06 EZ30 4th gen, 3.0R Spec B
Contact:

Re: V6 ability for pcm hammer.

Post by antus »

yes, the one you posed, after I merged it with the app, built it, and used pcmhammer p04 dev branch with local modifications for testing. The kernel doesnt seem to work.. yet. but i havnt had a lot of time to spend on it, its not game over. I just built it and ran it. I also changed the COP and load address of my asm kernel, with the same results. I'll have to strip one of them back further and keep playing until it starts talking back. I know we have the pieces, so its a matter of getting everything right in the same place at the same time.

Code: Select all

[09:38:19:891]  Uploading kernel to PCM.
[09:38:19:892]  Sending upload request for kernel size 1234, loadaddress FF9090
[09:38:19:913]  Found response, Success
[09:38:19:913]  Going to load a 1234 byte kernel to 0xFF9090
[09:38:19:913]  Sending end block payload with offset 0x0, start address 0xFF9090, length 0x4D2.
[09:38:19:914]  Sending 'test device present' notification.
[09:38:20:426]  Timeout.. no data present
[09:38:20:897]  Ignoring message: UnexpectedResponse
[09:38:20:902]  Found response, Success
[09:38:20:903]  Kernel upload 100% complete.
[09:38:21:410]  Timeout.. no data present
[09:38:21:411]  DVI: no message waiting.
[09:38:21:525]  Kernel Version: 080204FC
[09:38:21:527]  kernel uploaded to PCM succesfully. Requesting data...
I dont think that kernel version is real, I think thats something else after a crash. I'll pick up the investigation when I can, maybe tonight, maybe the weekend. Also get my logging set up better so I can see the actual data.
Have you read the FAQ? For lots of information and links to significant threads see here: http://pcmhacking.net/forums/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=1396
User avatar
Gampy
Posts: 2331
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2018 7:38 am

Re: V6 ability for pcm hammer.

Post by Gampy »

antus wrote:

Code: Select all

[09:38:21:525]  Kernel Version: 080204FC
I dont think that kernel version is real, I think thats something else after a crash.
Absolutely PERFECT!

That is in fact the Kernel version I have in the Micro Kernel I posted ... So it is working perfect!

[edit]
BTW, check out the kernel size ... :thumbup:
Intelligence is in the details!

It is easier not to learn bad habits, then it is to break them!

If I was here to win a popularity contest, their would be no point, so I wouldn't be here!
User avatar
Tazzi
Posts: 3422
Joined: Thu May 17, 2012 8:53 pm
cars: VE SS Ute
Location: WA
Contact:

Re: V6 ability for pcm hammer.

Post by Tazzi »

Gampy wrote:
antus wrote:

Code: Select all

[09:38:21:525]  Kernel Version: 080204FC
I dont think that kernel version is real, I think thats something else after a crash.
Absolutely PERFECT!

That is in fact the Kernel version I have in the Micro Kernel I posted ... So it is working perfect!

[edit]
BTW, check out the kernel size ... :thumbup:
Awesome!

Any particular reason for that specific kernel version?? Just an odd number is all :lol:
Your Local Aussie Reverse Engineer
Contact for Software/Hardware development and Reverse Engineering
Site:https://www.envyouscustoms.com
Mob:+61406 140 726
Image
Vampyre
Posts: 261
Joined: Wed Dec 06, 2017 1:02 pm
cars: grand am, trans am

Re: V6 ability for pcm hammer.

Post by Vampyre »

antus wrote:It defaults to p01/p59 so that osid isnt in the hwid columns i used from the file you posted a few pages back. I didnt commit all of them, but i thought a got all the sections for the hwid were all looking at, at the moment.
He didnt have the osid of that pcm loaded to the to find correct algo I believe is what he is saying so it defaulted to the p01 algo.
I was told p04s use 2 dif altos though so i need to find which osids use the second one
User avatar
antus
Site Admin
Posts: 8238
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2009 8:34 pm
cars: TX Gemini 2L Twincam
TX Gemini SR20 18psi
Datsun 1200 Ute
Subaru Blitzen '06 EZ30 4th gen, 3.0R Spec B
Contact:

Re: V6 ability for pcm hammer.

Post by antus »

@gampy - yeah that version totally threw me! thats cool! so, something to build on.
@vampyre, I put the OSIDs for HWID 9380717 in the p04 branch for now, on algo 14. They should all be the same, we'll be able to solve the other algo pretty easy when we get that far and someone has one of those HWIDs. For now Im happy to get HWID 9380717 working fully before we look at other variants. I know some other variations will just work, others wont. The read code probably wont be hard now, the write code and chain loading different parts of kernel code for write, and getting the inevitable bugs out will take longer.
Have you read the FAQ? For lots of information and links to significant threads see here: http://pcmhacking.net/forums/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=1396
User avatar
Gampy
Posts: 2331
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2018 7:38 am

Re: V6 ability for pcm hammer.

Post by Gampy »

Ding Dong, Ding dong ... Ok, So I just figured out the Algo thing, what a dummy, that's embarrassing! O-wells, It happens.

As for the kernel version, the numerical part is a number I've used for ~38 years as an ID, so, yes it does have special meaning to me.
Intelligence is in the details!

It is easier not to learn bad habits, then it is to break them!

If I was here to win a popularity contest, their would be no point, so I wouldn't be here!
Post Reply