godiag nano with pcmhammer

They go by many names, P01, P10, P12, P59, E38, VPW, '0411 etc.
99zguy
Posts: 20
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2023 3:30 am
cars: 99 Z28
97 Trans Am Vert
10 LS Camaro
08 Silverado
02 Avalanche
52 GMC 5.3 swap (in progress)
56 Chevy Hardtop (in progress)
Location: PA

Re: godiag nano with pcmhammer

Post by 99zguy »

As soon as I get back home in a bit I will load other logs. Have new power supply with 13.6v. I have tried 1x as well. Actually the godiag nano was only 22 bucks on sale on Amazon.. crazy but if works would ve a great device as like you said Gampy "it should work" however we all know how that is. I'll look at some more specs on this one in a little bit.
User avatar
Tazzi
Posts: 3550
Joined: Thu May 17, 2012 8:53 pm
cars: VE SS Ute
Location: WA
Contact:

Re: godiag nano with pcmhammer

Post by Tazzi »

99zguy wrote:As soon as I get back home in a bit I will load other logs. Have new power supply with 13.6v. I have tried 1x as well. Actually the godiag nano was only 22 bucks on sale on Amazon.. crazy but if works would ve a great device as like you said Gampy "it should work" however we all know how that is. I'll look at some more specs on this one in a little bit.
At $22usd, this would be a knock off Nano. It likely doesnt have the ability for large blocks. Could always try do really small blocks and see if that works.
Your Local Aussie Reverse Engineer
Contact for Software/Hardware development and Reverse Engineering
Site:https://www.envyouscustoms.com
Mob:+61406 140 726
Image
User avatar
Gampy
Posts: 2332
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2018 7:38 am

Re: godiag nano with pcmhammer

Post by Gampy »

How small Tazzi ??

-Enjoy
Intelligence is in the details!

It is easier not to learn bad habits, then it is to break them!

If I was here to win a popularity contest, their would be no point, so I wouldn't be here!
99zguy
Posts: 20
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2023 3:30 am
cars: 99 Z28
97 Trans Am Vert
10 LS Camaro
08 Silverado
02 Avalanche
52 GMC 5.3 swap (in progress)
56 Chevy Hardtop (in progress)
Location: PA

Re: godiag nano with pcmhammer

Post by 99zguy »

Here is latest logs and what GD nano looks like that I have. I bought off Amazon from the godiagstore. Again I have tried both 1K and 4K with no luck and here are both logs. I do not have GM sps currently to do any testing there. Willing to try whatever can to help with what I do have or can get.
PcmHammer_debugLog_20230107@194923_1k.txt
(54.71 KiB) Downloaded 1025 times
PcmHammer_debugLog_20230107@195057_4k.txt
(5.44 KiB) Downloaded 132 times
godiagnano.PNG
godiagnano.PNG (55.84 KiB) Viewed 2403 times
99zguy
Posts: 20
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2023 3:30 am
cars: 99 Z28
97 Trans Am Vert
10 LS Camaro
08 Silverado
02 Avalanche
52 GMC 5.3 swap (in progress)
56 Chevy Hardtop (in progress)
Location: PA

Re: godiag nano with pcmhammer

Post by 99zguy »

@Gampy Unfortunately there is nowhere on the box or the device that I can find any revision numbers to reference. Only what looks like a serial number that was on the box
User avatar
Tazzi
Posts: 3550
Joined: Thu May 17, 2012 8:53 pm
cars: VE SS Ute
Location: WA
Contact:

Re: godiag nano with pcmhammer

Post by Tazzi »

Gampy wrote:How small Tazzi ??

-Enjoy
Well.. the VPW standard does say 15bytes. That includes header and checksum at the end off the top of my head, so.. try.. 10 or 11?
Your Local Aussie Reverse Engineer
Contact for Software/Hardware development and Reverse Engineering
Site:https://www.envyouscustoms.com
Mob:+61406 140 726
Image
User avatar
Gampy
Posts: 2332
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2018 7:38 am

Re: godiag nano with pcmhammer

Post by Gampy »

Thanks Tazzi :thumbup:

The 1k log receives the ack for Upload Request.
[07:49:00:849] Sending upload request for kernel size 7890, loadaddress FF8000
[07:49:00:849] TX: 6C 10 F0 34 00 10 00 FF 80 00
[07:49:00:881] RX: 6C F0 10 74 00 44
Then chokes on the first upload packet of 1746 bytes ...
[07:49:00:959] TX: 6D 10 F0 36 00 06 D2 FF 98 00 ... Wacked for brevity
[07:49:00:990] WritePayload: Unable to send message.
Indicates to me it's a two fold issue ...
1. A buffer issue
2. it's not switching to 4x

At least that is how I read it ...

That small of packets at 1x will surely be slow!

-Enjoy
Intelligence is in the details!

It is easier not to learn bad habits, then it is to break them!

If I was here to win a popularity contest, their would be no point, so I wouldn't be here!
User avatar
antus
Site Admin
Posts: 9014
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2009 8:34 pm
cars: TX Gemini 2L Twincam
TX Gemini SR20 18psi
Datsun 1200 Ute
Subaru Blitzen '06 EZ30 4th gen, 3.0R Spec B
Contact:

Re: godiag nano with pcmhammer

Post by antus »

I think its the same device as here viewtopic.php?f=3&t=8026&p=118812
Have you read the FAQ? For lots of information and links to significant threads see here: http://pcmhacking.net/forums/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=1396
99zguy
Posts: 20
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2023 3:30 am
cars: 99 Z28
97 Trans Am Vert
10 LS Camaro
08 Silverado
02 Avalanche
52 GMC 5.3 swap (in progress)
56 Chevy Hardtop (in progress)
Location: PA

Re: godiag nano with pcmhammer

Post by 99zguy »

It definitely does look like the same. And just reading that quick it looks like he had to get the driver for the godiag version which would be the same driver that I have with this device. So, it seems like he never found a resolution for that vnci device?
Cincinnatus
Posts: 311
Joined: Fri Jul 30, 2021 5:49 pm
cars: 97 Corvette
92 Camaro
2005 Silverado
2001 Savana 2500
1998 c3500hd
1998 tahoe

Re: godiag nano with pcmhammer

Post by Cincinnatus »

It's the same device. Its not a nano, but i did see a listing description on ebay saying nano. Gampy will be testing soon it appears. I'm not sure why it doesn't work.
Post Reply