pcmhacking.net

As soon as I get back home in a bit I will load other logs. Have new power supply with 13.6v. I have tried 1x as well. Actually the godiag nano was only 22 bucks on sale on Amazon.. crazy but if works would ve a great device as like you said Gampy "it should work" however we all know how that is. I'll look at some more specs on this one in a little bit.

99zguy wrote:As soon as I get back home in a bit I will load other logs. Have new power supply with 13.6v. I have tried 1x as well. Actually the godiag nano was only 22 bucks on sale on Amazon.. crazy but if works would ve a great device as like you said Gampy "it should work" however we all know how that is. I'll look at some more specs on this one in a little bit.

At $22usd, this would be a knock off Nano. It likely doesnt have the ability for large blocks. Could always try do really small blocks and see if that works.

How small Tazzi ??

-Enjoy

Here is latest logs and what GD nano looks like that I have. I bought off Amazon from the godiagstore. Again I have tried both 1K and 4K with no luck and here are both logs. I do not have GM sps currently to do any testing there. Willing to try whatever can to help with what I do have or can get.

@Gampy Unfortunately there is nowhere on the box or the device that I can find any revision numbers to reference. Only what looks like a serial number that was on the box

Gampy wrote:How small Tazzi ??

-Enjoy

Well.. the VPW standard does say 15bytes. That includes header and checksum at the end off the top of my head, so.. try.. 10 or 11?

Thanks Tazzi

The 1k log receives the ack for Upload Request.

[07:49:00:849] Sending upload request for kernel size 7890, loadaddress FF8000
[07:49:00:849] TX: 6C 10 F0 34 00 10 00 FF 80 00
[07:49:00:881] RX: 6C F0 10 74 00 44

Then chokes on the first upload packet of 1746 bytes ...

[07:49:00:959] TX: 6D 10 F0 36 00 06 D2 FF 98 00 ... Wacked for brevity
[07:49:00:990] WritePayload: Unable to send message.

Indicates to me it's a two fold issue ...
1. A buffer issue
2. it's not switching to 4x

At least that is how I read it ...

That small of packets at 1x will surely be slow!

-Enjoy

I think its the same device as here viewtopic.php?f=3&t=8026&p=118812

It definitely does look like the same. And just reading that quick it looks like he had to get the driver for the godiag version which would be the same driver that I have with this device. So, it seems like he never found a resolution for that vnci device?

It's the same device. Its not a nano, but i did see a listing description on ebay saying nano. Gampy will be testing soon it appears. I'm not sure why it doesn't work.