If it's only used for spark I wouldn't bother with a second one, just move it.
If axis is user configurable would be good, but if not may be worth considering a separate enhanced bin for those using serious boost.
Keep up the good work, would still be good to get rid of the MAF altogether and replace with a MAP sensor
No doubt you'd move the sensor for realistic intake temps to the heads. Obviously this isn't done in the factory form even with a supercharger so my experience with LIM temps is little. If someone can fill me in with what intake temps you see on super6 or other applications on ecotec LIMS with or without a cooler then i can try and accommodate for it better.
The usable range of the sensor is -40 - 151c
Just incase you might not know the edge of the table being 102 means what's in that row is applied from there up.
yoda69 wrote:If it's only used for spark I wouldn't bother with a second one, just move it.
If axis is user configurable would be good, but if not may be worth considering a separate enhanced bin for those using serious boost.
Keep up the good work, would still be good to get rid of the MAF altogether and replace with a MAP sensor
Unfortunately i dont get much time. Got this together over the weekend so i can test it on tuesday, then im hoping it'l be open to the public once these tweaks being discussed are ironed out and the other models done:D
MAP vs MAF is always a debate, Personally MAF has come along way and i can't find any reason worth keeping MAP for other than to see how much boost your getting, nothing stopping you from hooking up a map sensor on the spare input as a second tuning reference.
testing has gone ok, VT 12psi with factory supercharger, intercooler and stage1 mace L67 cam reached 1070cylair, for those who are interested. Will be doing some bigger ones in the future so will see how the extended range goes.