That's a great point Ant!
I forgot that FRAM was even a thing since the last time I heard news about it was when they were developing the tech and it was thought to fail in the market so development slowed or halted iirc, but they were aiming for DRAM replacement early on in that. Had no idea that it ended up in eeprom and SRAM market space as an actual real product.
This summary appears to show that it's pretty ideal for this.
Looking at the last bit, yeah that's why it never replaced DRAM like they hoped.
SRAM based NVRAM
-
vlad01
- Posts: 8548
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2012 8:41 am
- cars: VP I S
VP I executive
VP II executive
VP II executive #2 - Location: Kyneton, Vic
Re: SRAM based NVRAM
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
Holden202T
- Posts: 10435
- Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2009 11:05 am
- Location: Tenambit, NSW
Re: SRAM based NVRAM
i looked up fram ..... $40 just for the chip!
the whole reason i started looking at srams was cause they are like $10 with a controller!
the whole reason i started looking at srams was cause they are like $10 with a controller!
No matter what the question is, the answer is always more horsepower! 
Just starting out? Have a read of the getting started guide
Basic tuning of a delco ECM with $12P thread
Advanced tuning of a delco ECM with $12P thread

Just starting out? Have a read of the getting started guide
Basic tuning of a delco ECM with $12P thread
Advanced tuning of a delco ECM with $12P thread
-
vlad01
- Posts: 8548
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2012 8:41 am
- cars: VP I S
VP I executive
VP II executive
VP II executive #2 - Location: Kyneton, Vic
Re: SRAM based NVRAM
Yeah actually, I've been talking to Staggie via PM, he found old stuff on this forum where this was already looked into, and the FRAM requires the CE to be clocked, so it won't work on the Delco without more serious engineering, and yeah the cost is horrendous for what it is. Just like I thought that FRAM was dead in the water way back in it's development, that cost reflects that low scalability and presumably low yield out of the fabs. Back when I read the papers on the concept and early samples of the tech and the aim for eventual DRAM replacement (would have been awesome), it sounded like it wasn't going to ever make it as a product. Now that it's a product despite the odds, it only a tiny niche one at that, hence the price tag.
The other Cypress ultra low powered chip I suggested is what he's going with to investigate further. It should on paper last a few years on coin cells we hope.
The other Cypress ultra low powered chip I suggested is what he's going with to investigate further. It should on paper last a few years on coin cells we hope.
-
antus
- Site Admin
- Posts: 10012
- Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2009 10:34 am
- cars: TX Gemini 2L Twincam 8psi
TX Gemini SR20 18psi
Datsun 1200 Ute
Subaru Blitzen '06 EZ30 4th gen, 3.0R Spec B
Subaru WRX 2007
Re: SRAM based NVRAM
I'd be interested to know why clocking ce is a problem. Is it just complexity? There is a clock signal, or perhaps some very small MCUs that could handle that with very little code if it's not a direct connection, or needs some delay etc. Something like https://www.digikey.com.au/en/products/ ... SF/4368794 (wtf, atmel got bought by microchip?)
Have you read the FAQ? For lots of information and links to significant threads see here: http://pcmhacking.net/forums/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=1396
-
Staggie
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2010 12:22 pm
- cars: VT 3.8L Calais, VK wagon with EFI 5L x2, VN SV3800, LX Torana
Re: SRAM based NVRAM
This is just my personal opinion, but yeah pretty much is adding complexity and expense, with the only real gain being no battery required.
Would it be a cool little project just cos, yes, but I feel it would also cause its fair share of grey hairs. If we didnt have to change the way CE behaved i would be all for it but I feel the KISS approach is better for long term reliability in this case.
P.s. that microcontroller is definitely tiny, could certainly think of a few uses for that when dont need all the I/O.
Would it be a cool little project just cos, yes, but I feel it would also cause its fair share of grey hairs. If we didnt have to change the way CE behaved i would be all for it but I feel the KISS approach is better for long term reliability in this case.
P.s. that microcontroller is definitely tiny, could certainly think of a few uses for that when dont need all the I/O.
-
Staggie
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2010 12:22 pm
- cars: VT 3.8L Calais, VK wagon with EFI 5L x2, VN SV3800, LX Torana
Re: SRAM based NVRAM
So a bit of an update on this one, finally got around to putting one together to test the CY62128ELL and I can confirm there is a hell of a power saving, with WE pulled up on Vout it still is only pulling 0.9uA at idle.
Have managed to get it programmed and bank switching correctly, also being detected correctly in TunerPro RT as writeable.
Will give it a run in a vehicle in the next week or two but all looks very promising. 12 years battery life over 2 CR1225's should be enough I reckon.
Have managed to get it programmed and bank switching correctly, also being detected correctly in TunerPro RT as writeable.
Will give it a run in a vehicle in the next week or two but all looks very promising. 12 years battery life over 2 CR1225's should be enough I reckon.
-
vlad01
- Posts: 8548
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2012 8:41 am
- cars: VP I S
VP I executive
VP II executive
VP II executive #2 - Location: Kyneton, Vic
Re: SRAM based NVRAM
Well done!
keeping an eye on this one.