pcmhacking.net

yeah i've got two monitors at home, makes tuning so much easier!

we need 2 monitors for another reason being the dyno screen. add that too we then need triple monitors lol

Jayme wrote:yeah nothing wrong with the calcVE itself... its all about how you use it, for example if you flit through a VE cell briefly during Decel, the wideband reading is going to be waaaaaaay off reality.. and so will the calcVE reading. if you use that log in a histogram then copy the calcVE histogram over your VE table, then that cell will by a big incorrect spike. thats why I tend to use the monitor window, you can exclude the cells that are bullshitting to you.

yeah this is why I look at the data in different ways, sample counts, min/max, averages and most recent then include cross referencing to the monitors so I can make sense of the "quality" of the data and copy over what I want.

The first few runs I just copy the lot as an average as that is a way better starting point than the stock VE table.

This tune only had 2 runs over the VE table to get it in the ball park. Some spikes from hunting and rev limiter there too.

immortality wrote:Do you have issues with broken studs?

Shouldn't you really use a hub-centric type spacer?

Do they make one of those driveshafts in your required length?

So, this has been playing on my mind for a while, I had these made, should do the trick...



Oh, and now ready for paint

Don't paint it, it only adds weight

HQ355 wrote:Don't paint it, it only adds weight

True story!

vlad01 wrote:

HQ355 wrote:Don't paint it, it only adds weight

True story!

Yeah. This thread should be "how to loose 210kgs" if you wanted to paint it.

So how much is it weighing in at now? Should definitely tear up the track now though with amputation diet it's had

I think its down 260 kg ?

It really is quiet unbelievable how much weight it has lost, I can't wait to see what the final numbers are. Performance wise you'd get better gains from the diet than just adding more power.