Electronic Fuel Injection - Developement & Tuning
https://pcmhacking.net/forums/
Biggvl wrote:Fitting pistons in 'backwards' was a common practice in HQ racing and speedway 202 engines, would alter the timing of the piston, leaves the piston in 'compression' stage for slightly longer - helps produce torque in the low to mid range.
As Vlad said, not good for wear or noise.
yeah I heard if its the same guy, he called it a tangential engine layout and the gains were significant too.Jayme wrote:excuse my mspaint skillz, but ive also heard of a bloke boring a 202 at an angle and then decking the block at the same angle to effectively achieve this. apparently it increased torque by a decent margin. the theory was having a more direct push on the crank allowed more power to be transferred for longer during the power stroke or something to that effect.
might this have been done by moving the crank tunnel?but ive also heard of a bloke boring a 202 at an angle and then decking the block at the same angle to effectively achieve this
Biggvl wrote:might this have been done by moving the crank tunnel?but ive also heard of a bloke boring a 202 at an angle and then decking the block at the same angle to effectively achieve this
Biggvl wrote:might this have been done by moving the crank tunnel?but ive also heard of a bloke boring a 202 at an angle and then decking the block at the same angle to effectively achieve this
But would an offset measuring in the thou's of an inch make that much, if any, difference?Biggvl wrote:We aren't talking about inches of relocation, more like thou's...
Chuff wrote:But would an offset measuring in the thou's of an inch make that much, if any, difference?Biggvl wrote:We aren't talking about inches of relocation, more like thou's...
Just asking.