Results after a "profesional tune"

Tuning The Delco In Realtime
User avatar
The1
Posts: 4694
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 10:23 am

Re: Results after a "profesional tune"

Post by The1 »

no WOT fueling wont be affected by closed loop or BLM's and depending on the cam if the fuel wasn't tuned it'd be maxing out the 20% margin as well.
User avatar
antus
Site Admin
Posts: 8253
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2009 8:34 pm
cars: TX Gemini 2L Twincam
TX Gemini SR20 18psi
Datsun 1200 Ute
Subaru Blitzen '06 EZ30 4th gen, 3.0R Spec B
Contact:

Re: Results after a "profesional tune"

Post by antus »

Yeah, wont be able to confirm power enrichment, decel enleanment, lean cruise etc
Have you read the FAQ? For lots of information and links to significant threads see here: http://pcmhacking.net/forums/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=1396
User avatar
j_ds_au
Posts: 384
Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2015 4:21 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: Results after a "profesional tune"

Post by j_ds_au »

The1 wrote:no WOT fueling wont be affected by closed loop or BLM's and depending on the cam if the fuel wasn't tuned it'd be maxing out the 20% margin as well.
Ah, I see. So WOT is open loop, eh?

Joe.
Dylan
Posts: 3356
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2010 6:35 pm
cars: VR Commodore V8

Re: Results after a "profesional tune"

Post by Dylan »

Any target afr outside of 14.7:1 is open loop. A narrow band O2 sensor is extremely accurate at that afr.
But very innacurate outside of this. They can be a good tool to verify your wide band as well.
User avatar
j_ds_au
Posts: 384
Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2015 4:21 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: Results after a "profesional tune"

Post by j_ds_au »

Dylan wrote:Any target afr outside of 14.7:1 is open loop. A narrow band O2 sensor is extremely accurate at that afr.
But very innacurate outside of this. They can be a good tool to verify your wide band as well.
Forgive my ignorance, but I thought stoichiometric was always the target (ignoring the slight rich/lean cycling that is apparently needed to make the cat working properly). Is it just the case that WOT is too uncommon for the ECU to learn the appropriate fuel trims, or it doesn't even try?

Joe.
User avatar
VL400
Posts: 4991
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 2:54 pm
cars: VL Calais and Toyota Landcruiser. Plus some toys :)
Location: Perth, WA
Contact:

Re: Results after a "profesional tune"

Post by VL400 »

In simple terms stoich is the point that all fuel is burned leaving no excess oxygen. Running leaner than stoich an excess of oxygen is present, while richer leaves fuel behind. The narrowband oxygen sensor is able detect this lack of or excess oxygen. But its very binary, it can really only say richer or leaner not exactly X AFR. A wideband is basically a narrowband sensor, but has a pump to add or remove oxygen. How much it needs to add/subtract is proportional to the AFR.

Stoich differs for every fuel type, but as the sensor is detecting oxygen you can still have closed loop even if stoich might be 6.4:1 when running methanol.

Google has a heap of info on stoich and also lambda (stoich = lambda 1).
User avatar
j_ds_au
Posts: 384
Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2015 4:21 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: Results after a "profesional tune"

Post by j_ds_au »

Yeah, I was reading that narrow band sensors have a range of about 14.4 to 15.0 (referenced to petrol), so stoich is pretty much all that an ECU can target in closed loop. I'll have to do some more reading to see if there's really any reason an ECU would want to target a non-stoich AFR, but if so, it would have to do this open loop, and guess the AFR.

Joe.
Dylan
Posts: 3356
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2010 6:35 pm
cars: VR Commodore V8

Re: Results after a "profesional tune"

Post by Dylan »

There's lots of reasons an ecu will command an afr outside of 14.7 which is open loop as you said.
That's why it's important to get the ve table spot on so it's accurate.
User avatar
madmaxisback
Posts: 145
Joined: Mon Nov 09, 2009 4:56 pm
cars: VN Calais
VK Berlina
Location: Perth

Re: Results after a "profesional tune"

Post by madmaxisback »

Great info here guys! Best website ever!
Post Reply