pcmhacking.net

Thanks!

Blown away at how many entries are in this, thanks.
Noticed a minor spelling error on one entry, no biggie, figured i'd point it out.

Ken wrote:Blown away at how many entries are in this, thanks.
Noticed a minor spelling error on one entry, no biggie, figured i'd point it out.

Inkection.png

Fixed, lol.

Has anyone used the ac pressure limits before (4B94)?

I tried to lower the HP side to limit the compressor over pressuring but it doesn't seem to be doing anything.

I did note my file has 490psi for the high pressure high limit and gm docs claim this is 429psi. So maybe it's another variable that is the absolute max.

I ported the mapping over to OS ...618. I'm 99.5% sure it's correct addressing to the XDF. analog cycling is the ac setting with dual fans. everything works, but before I got the cycling just right I over pressured twice and the pcm never caught it and disengaged the compressor- so I want to lower this value. I'd rather not rape the sensor scale table.

Just curious what others have noticed. Thanks.

edit- got it fixed. tables work. I just had my AC set to analog cycling (3) and it should have been set to just analog (2). analog cycling does not use the pressure sensor at all, for compressor or fan control.

Hey guys, can we get a verify on "Impact Factor Blend Fraction" table under fuel transients? First row for me is all 0s in the bin and second row better matches the first row of the table that I am trying to use. Everything else has been looking great so far, thanks for providing this to us!

robstah wrote:Hey guys, can we get a verify on "Impact Factor Blend Fraction" table under fuel transients? First row for me is all 0s in the bin and second row better matches the first row of the table that I am trying to use. Everything else has been looking great so far, thanks for providing this to us!

I compared the table to the 7603 XDF suing a 2004 Corvette bin and they are identical. The first row for 20 kPa is all 0's.