Clutch questions. Puck disks etc...
Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2023 3:04 pm
While I have been dealing with some clutch woes on the shitbox and now have the base level Xtreme organic kit ready to install.
I started to think about the high performance options out there for that "one day"project that is the VP S
I have an NPC ceramic chushioned kit which has been great, apart from what Gareth mentioned a while ago a delay type resistance probably being the cable and I have confirmed that is the case with an identical spare new in packet cable I have in my spares, it also even with no load is very slow to push and pull the cable through by hand.
Anyone have recommendations on a brand of cable that is decently heat resistant ( most options shrivel and peel immediately to even a heat gun on low) and also has very low resistance.
I have a Dellow HD beefy cable in the shitbox at the moment and it's too long on the inner cable and I had to use a 12mm spacer and it's on the last 2 threads of adjustment. Otherwise it's low resistance and heat resistance have been the best so far since genuine factory cables were last a thing. They just made it wrong
Anyway, getting back to the clutches.
For me, a positive bite is highly desired, I don't like slippy gradual feeling clutches. Clunky engagement is a nice subjective feeling to me.
Shudder
what car I have doesn't have it, so not an issue. I've learned that it's pretty much a given with a Buick v6 and the commodore chassis/driveline dynamics. Ceramic actually was by far the best in this regard.
Pedal lightness is a big criteria for me, I hate heavy pedals, I don't mind if they are heavy on the initial bit and then "pop" to become easy, the NPC one is like that. I hate clutches that have no "pop"or worse, get firmer the more you press them (cough cough... exedy
).
Another thought is, with high rpm shifting, the lighter the disk, the easier the shift is and the higher the rpm a given gearbox synchros can manage without excessive baulking and eventual burning of them. They are essentially brakes used to slow down the engine side of the gearbox rotating mass forward of the main shaft during shifting. The disk carries the majority all of this inertia.
My planned engine just slightly pushes past the rpm shift limits of the T5 and a light disk will solve this potential issue.
So I thought, to get a single plate clutch to the torque holding capacity required, estimated 330ft-lb + some margin, so lets say 30-50%. So somewhere around the 450ft-lb before slippage.
To get the lightest pedal and the hold required, can a mild to moderately upgraded pressure plate and say a 6 puck ceramic or carbotic material disk achieve this?
I recall Gareth had a 6 puck on this speedway car, stock flywheel and some lightweight billet alloy cover pressure plate. I never felt how the pedal was, but it would have similar torque output from the engine to what I am looking at. So if you chime in that would be awesome
Multiplate is an option, I do believe that is even better when it's pedal effort vs hold ratio is concerned but as for disk inertia it could be a step backwards? Or perhaps not since the diameter of them are much much smaller.
I started to think about the high performance options out there for that "one day"project that is the VP S

I have an NPC ceramic chushioned kit which has been great, apart from what Gareth mentioned a while ago a delay type resistance probably being the cable and I have confirmed that is the case with an identical spare new in packet cable I have in my spares, it also even with no load is very slow to push and pull the cable through by hand.
Anyone have recommendations on a brand of cable that is decently heat resistant ( most options shrivel and peel immediately to even a heat gun on low) and also has very low resistance.
I have a Dellow HD beefy cable in the shitbox at the moment and it's too long on the inner cable and I had to use a 12mm spacer and it's on the last 2 threads of adjustment. Otherwise it's low resistance and heat resistance have been the best so far since genuine factory cables were last a thing. They just made it wrong

Anyway, getting back to the clutches.
For me, a positive bite is highly desired, I don't like slippy gradual feeling clutches. Clunky engagement is a nice subjective feeling to me.
Shudder

Pedal lightness is a big criteria for me, I hate heavy pedals, I don't mind if they are heavy on the initial bit and then "pop" to become easy, the NPC one is like that. I hate clutches that have no "pop"or worse, get firmer the more you press them (cough cough... exedy


Another thought is, with high rpm shifting, the lighter the disk, the easier the shift is and the higher the rpm a given gearbox synchros can manage without excessive baulking and eventual burning of them. They are essentially brakes used to slow down the engine side of the gearbox rotating mass forward of the main shaft during shifting. The disk carries the majority all of this inertia.
My planned engine just slightly pushes past the rpm shift limits of the T5 and a light disk will solve this potential issue.
So I thought, to get a single plate clutch to the torque holding capacity required, estimated 330ft-lb + some margin, so lets say 30-50%. So somewhere around the 450ft-lb before slippage.
To get the lightest pedal and the hold required, can a mild to moderately upgraded pressure plate and say a 6 puck ceramic or carbotic material disk achieve this?
I recall Gareth had a 6 puck on this speedway car, stock flywheel and some lightweight billet alloy cover pressure plate. I never felt how the pedal was, but it would have similar torque output from the engine to what I am looking at. So if you chime in that would be awesome

Multiplate is an option, I do believe that is even better when it's pedal effort vs hold ratio is concerned but as for disk inertia it could be a step backwards? Or perhaps not since the diameter of them are much much smaller.