ALDL logging - set up problems

160 And 8192 Baud Aldl
hatchssv8
Posts: 45
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2010 6:14 pm
cars: Holdens 66, 76, 77, 90, 05
Location: Melbourne

Re: ALDL logging - set up problems

Post by hatchssv8 »

spot on Jayme.

so as I stated I get the 8192 interface modded to the 808
and then burn the BKBJ or BKBK to a 32k chip with $12 code


Does this sound correct??
User avatar
Jayme
Posts: 2585
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 8:59 am
Location: North Coast, NSW

Re: ALDL logging - set up problems

Post by Jayme »

yes, except the 215 bins arent $12, youll have to find the correct definition to suit if you want to mod the tune. ive made my own tune for a cammed 355 based on the $12P BLCF cal before, turned out pretty good. just have to use the wideband to get the fuel right, and used the 215 spark map.
nig087
Posts: 36
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 11:39 am
cars: 1969 ht ute
1994 vr ute
1968 hk brougham

Re: ALDL logging - set up problems

Post by nig087 »

hi mate have you still got the cammed 355 bin file if so post it up thanks
User avatar
Jayme
Posts: 2585
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 8:59 am
Location: North Coast, NSW

Re: ALDL logging - set up problems

Post by Jayme »

still trying to lucky dip yourself a good tune are you?
nig087
Posts: 36
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 11:39 am
cars: 1969 ht ute
1994 vr ute
1968 hk brougham

Re: ALDL logging - set up problems

Post by nig087 »

heres the tune i got it idles great at 1000 not rich but won't rev i just want it to go like my rich tune which won't idle but wheel spin 1 & 2
Attachments
vr 355 rich went good won't idle.bin
(32 KiB) Downloaded 321 times
vr 355ci idles great won't rev.bin
(32 KiB) Downloaded 313 times
User avatar
antus
Site Admin
Posts: 8253
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2009 8:34 pm
cars: TX Gemini 2L Twincam
TX Gemini SR20 18psi
Datsun 1200 Ute
Subaru Blitzen '06 EZ30 4th gen, 3.0R Spec B
Contact:

Re: ALDL logging - set up problems

Post by antus »

Im gonna have to put a stop to this thread I think before it gets out of hand. Nig087, you have had lots of help, more than most people get, but posting random tunes backward and forward is just wasting our time and resources. Feel free to hang around if you want to get serious about learning to do it yourself, otherwise take the best tune you have to a local tuning shop and see what they can do for you. Thanks for your understanding in this.

Im not going to lock the thread. If someone wants to spend their time trying to merge two random tunes without any logged data and post it up for you then you can count yourself lucky but dont expect too much from the usually friendly folk around here.
Have you read the FAQ? For lots of information and links to significant threads see here: http://pcmhacking.net/forums/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=1396
Post Reply