Difference between HPT SD patches and tricking MAF to fail?
-
vwnut8392
- Posts: 68
- Joined: Thu Feb 27, 2014 9:38 pm
- cars: AAN powered 83 audi 4000 quattro
1983 audi UR quattro
1992 GTI VR6
Difference between HPT SD patches and tricking MAF to fail?
As the subject asks, does anyone here know the difference between if any when you apply a speed density patch with HPtuners vs just changing the several suggested variables in the mapping to force the MAP sensor to fail and revert to speed density?
-
AngelMarc
- Posts: 612
- Joined: Sat Apr 08, 2023 11:23 am
- cars: A CB450 running to 8,000RPM with a P59.
Re: Difference between HPT SD patches and tricking MAF to fail?
A DTC being read by scanners is all I'm aware. I've had a 12587603 P59 behave as if it's speed density without the DTCs and MAF disconnected, but I didn't get open throttle spark tables.
Even with the TPS and VSS setting for that set to 0. It just wouldn't.
Even with the TPS and VSS setting for that set to 0. It just wouldn't.
Don't stress specific units.
-
hjtrbo
- Posts: 353
- Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2021 8:57 am
- cars: VF2 R8 LSA
FG XR6T
HJ Ute w/RB25DET
Re: Difference between HPT SD patches and tricking MAF to fail?
As reported on the hp forum, the sd patch fixes a glitch where the reported airmass momentarily drops to 0 and all fuelling is lost. However, HP did not release the SD patch for all OS's. For those that remain, the bug is with the spark^2 terms in the ve co-eff calcs as was proven by hp forum member verlon. The solution is to 0 out the spark^2 ve terms.
-
AngelMarc
- Posts: 612
- Joined: Sat Apr 08, 2023 11:23 am
- cars: A CB450 running to 8,000RPM with a P59.