Possible new OBD2 interface

They go by many names, P01, P10, P12, P59, E38, VPW, '0411 etc.
User avatar
NSFW
Posts: 802
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2018 5:13 am

Possible new OBD2 interface

Post by NSFW »

https://www.crowdsupply.com/meatpi-elec ... /wican-pro
https://github.com/meatpiHQ/wican-fw

You can't buy one yet, but the last update was 3 months ago and they were just about to start production, so maybe it'll be ready soon?

It supports every automotive protocol that I've ever heard of, it's open source, and it's $90 US.

The big question in my mind is whether or not it supports VPW at 4x speed. It looks like the low-level protocol stuff is all done on a dedicated chip, so despite the firmware being open source it might not be possible to add 4x support if it's not already there.
Please don't PM me with technical questions - start a thread instead, and send me a link to it. That way I can answer in public, and help other people who have the same question. Thanks!
ironduke
Posts: 820
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2020 1:32 pm
cars: Mainly GM trucks, a Cruze and an Equinox for dailys..

Re: Possible new OBD2 interface

Post by ironduke »

Looks interesting, quickly scanned but I don't see anything about J2534 standard?
User avatar
NSFW
Posts: 802
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2018 5:13 am

Re: Possible new OBD2 interface

Post by NSFW »

It uses a serial connection, similar to ELM devices. As far as I know, J2534 is strictly a Windows thing, but serial works with pretty much every operating system.
Please don't PM me with technical questions - start a thread instead, and send me a link to it. That way I can answer in public, and help other people who have the same question. Thanks!
Charlescrown
Posts: 2095
Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2011 9:58 pm
cars: V8 VR Commodore BT1
LB Lancer 2L turbo & Delco
Starion TBI with Delco
Mitsubishi Lancer EVO4 track car
NA MX5
3 vintage motor bikes
Location: Padstow NSW

Re: Possible new OBD2 interface

Post by Charlescrown »

I don't think J2534 has anything to do with windows. It's a standard set by the SAE for communicatios protocol to reprogram ECU's.
User avatar
antus
Site Admin
Posts: 10096
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2009 10:34 am
cars: TX Gemini 2L Twincam 8psi
TX Gemini SR20 18psi
Datsun 1200 Ute
Subaru Blitzen '06 EZ30 4th gen, 3.0R Spec B
Subaru WRX 2007

Re: Possible new OBD2 interface

Post by antus »

J2534 doesn't say it has to be windows but then they define the software interface as a windows DLL interface, which then means it has to be windows. It would seem this tool doesn't support J2534, thus cant be used with most OEM tools that use that standard, or aftermarket / hobbyist tools that are written for J2534 and we also dont know if they intend to support large packets so we don't know if it'll work with pcmhammer yet (using the STN command set that it advertises). But, using STN it would have no 4x support as its not in the protocol and so would be a slow interface. At this stage I think the obdxpro interfaces are a better option for the sort of stuff we talk about here as they have an open protocol, do work with pcmhammer and do have J2534, as well as they're developed by those friendly to our community and who support the tools well. This meat pi is probably fine for people logging only or working with can and with no interest in J2534.

I had a bit of a look around the github source, it looks like only the can protocol is there, the rest is either private or not written yet. I also dont see all the PC protocols they advertise, and non-can protocols are not listed in the device pinouts in the readme.
Have you read the FAQ? For lots of information and links to significant threads see here: http://pcmhacking.net/forums/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=1396