Stock memcal compared to factory BIN file

General Tuning Questions And Discussions
Post Reply
User avatar
300kwv6
Posts: 80
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2012 3:16 pm
cars: VR V6 Stroker Turbo
BA XR6T - no more
VP V6 Vacationer - no more
Location: Perth

Stock memcal compared to factory BIN file

Post by 300kwv6 »

Hi all,

Picked up a cheap vp v6 auto using memcal code BAAM0265. Runs nice and smooth with this installed. I read the memcal and then compared to the original factory bin BAAM0265 and they are 3 bytes different.

I have a spare memcal with SST 27SF512 installed, and have written the BAAM0265 bin file to it several times, but wont idle like original memcal. I have tried stacking the bin 4 times through tunerpro, also used offsets of C000h and 0xC000.

But still isnt the same. Any ideas?

Cheers
User avatar
Holden202T
Posts: 10394
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2009 9:05 pm
Location: Tenambit, NSW
Contact:

Re: Stock memcal compared to factory BIN file

Post by Holden202T »

4 x stack is what you need with zero offset on the SST
User avatar
300kwv6
Posts: 80
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2012 3:16 pm
cars: VR V6 Stroker Turbo
BA XR6T - no more
VP V6 Vacationer - no more
Location: Perth

Re: Stock memcal compared to factory BIN file

Post by 300kwv6 »

Thanks, that did the trick. Turns out I had a crook eeprom, new one is fine.

Cheers
Post Reply