Hi all,
Picked up a cheap vp v6 auto using memcal code BAAM0265. Runs nice and smooth with this installed. I read the memcal and then compared to the original factory bin BAAM0265 and they are 3 bytes different.
I have a spare memcal with SST 27SF512 installed, and have written the BAAM0265 bin file to it several times, but wont idle like original memcal. I have tried stacking the bin 4 times through tunerpro, also used offsets of C000h and 0xC000.
But still isnt the same. Any ideas?
Cheers
Stock memcal compared to factory BIN file
- Holden202T
- Posts: 10394
- Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2009 9:05 pm
- Location: Tenambit, NSW
- Contact:
Re: Stock memcal compared to factory BIN file
4 x stack is what you need with zero offset on the SST
No matter what the question is, the answer is always more horsepower! 
Just starting out? Have a read of the getting started guide
Basic tuning of a delco ECM with $12P thread
Advanced tuning of a delco ECM with $12P thread

Just starting out? Have a read of the getting started guide
Basic tuning of a delco ECM with $12P thread
Advanced tuning of a delco ECM with $12P thread
- 300kwv6
- Posts: 80
- Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2012 3:16 pm
- cars: VR V6 Stroker Turbo
BA XR6T - no more
VP V6 Vacationer - no more - Location: Perth
Re: Stock memcal compared to factory BIN file
Thanks, that did the trick. Turns out I had a crook eeprom, new one is fine.
Cheers
Cheers