Knock Counts

General Tuning Questions And Discussions
vc81
Posts: 158
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2013 9:32 am
cars: vn v6

Knock Counts

Post by vc81 »

Hi all, just want to clarify that I'm on the right track -

In the attached screenshot at the 2000rpm 90kpa cell it has a figure of 1.670.

Does this mean that the timing was retarded by 1.670 degrees from what ever it was running at in that cell because knock was detected?

Thanks,
vc81.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
VL400
Posts: 4991
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 4:54 am
cars: VL Calais and Toyota Landcruiser. Plus some toys :)
Location: Perth, WA

Re: Knock Counts

Post by VL400 »

Yes, its showing knock retard in teh cells. At the top of the table it mentions MAP vs Engine RPM vs Knock Retard Value.

Be careful how you interpret the data though as it is showing the running average in your screen shot. Maybe use Running Maximum to show the higest retard value logged.
User avatar
vlad01
Posts: 8550
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2012 8:41 am
cars: VP I S
VP I executive
VP II executive
VP II executive #2
Location: Kyneton, Vic

Re: Knock Counts

Post by vlad01 »

So then could you use that value to reduce the timing in those area by that amount that its retarding by? assuming fuel and VE is correct?
User avatar
Holden202T
Posts: 10435
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2009 11:05 am
Location: Tenambit, NSW

Re: Knock Counts

Post by Holden202T »

yes you can ..... but also keep in mind what the rest of the timing table looks like around that area, it can be false knock, but try and remove 1 degrees, then see if in another log it still shows knock in the same area just less retard, that will give you a clue as to if its legitimate knock or false knock (ie. lean spot or engine noise etc)
vc81
Posts: 158
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2013 9:32 am
cars: vn v6

Re: Knock Counts

Post by vc81 »

Will do thanks for the replys.