HSV VS 304 ignition failure

A place For General Chit Chat Etc
HQ355
Posts: 1217
Joined: Sun Nov 17, 2013 6:53 am
cars: HQ Holden

Re: HSV VS 304 ignition failure

Post by HQ355 »

I thought the main reason the coil was back there was so it couldn't be hot wired ? Any other reason dosnt make sense as it's not an atractive engine bay
immortality
Posts: 3678
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 12:31 pm
cars: VH, VN, VS, VX

Re: HSV VS 304 ignition failure

Post by immortality »

don't know TBH.

But you'r right, not very attractive to look at.

Looks much better with a more traditional intake and 1000cfm throttle body on top :)

TBH though, I do like the look of a functional engine bay. All those fancy engine bays look nice but I don't think I'll ever worry about trying to hide wiring and stuff like that.
vs ss
Posts: 590
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2011 7:57 pm
cars: hsv enhanced vs ss
vt xu6
fb holden
toyota landcruiser
vt ss s1
Location: perth wa

Re: HSV VS 304 ignition failure

Post by vs ss »

On the injected ones there's no place it could on the engine without sticking out like a sore thumb.
I guess you could jump it on a vn/vp to get spark but then you got to get the ecu fired up and steering lock off so they usally went straight for the barrel. Then of coarse you have vats on the later ones which made it harder.
HQ355
Posts: 1217
Joined: Sun Nov 17, 2013 6:53 am
cars: HQ Holden

Re: HSV VS 304 ignition failure

Post by HQ355 »

Don't quote me on it, just what I was told years ago, holden could've mounted coil on firewall, I agree, can't wait to get new manifold and tb on my HQ and unlock a bit more hp
Post Reply